Stock Buyback: Wealth Reinforced, Public Funds Lost?

Table of Contents

Stock Buyback

Once an illegal practice, stock buybacks are when a company repurchases its own shares. Buyback programs often lead to company profits getting invested into the stock market, sitting there appreciating in value without incurring taxes until they are withdrawn.

This is money that could go to expanding the business, creating jobs, increasing worker salaries. Capital that could, and maybe should, be going to paying off trillions in national debt and improving social services, for example. 

Furthermore, the working class’ retirement is 401(k) and IRAs so that means it is in the stock market. If share buybacks redirect much of the GDP growth (company’s profits) far more to company executives instead of going to working-class retirement funds, then American workers might never get an actual retirement.  

Keep in mind: the wealthiest 1% own 56% of the U.S. stock market. Since they can keep it there as long as they please, they can theoretically never pay taxes on all of the stock they keep holding. Share buybacks allow the wealthiest to essentially store their profits without having to pay taxes on profits. 

Do you think capital gains tax rate creates an investor class? Have your say by joining the Zero Theft voting platform…

A Potential Rigged Area of the Economy

For the last 200+ years, the U.S. has enjoyed very strong and consistent GDP (Gross Domestic Product) growth (look at the blue line in the graph below). The question is: why have the real median weekly earnings of full-time workers stagnated (red line)? Is the American public at large receiving its fair share of the GDP it’s responsible for, or are we getting ripped off, for one, by crony capitalists buying back company shares?

Potential Rigged Area of the Economy


The Zero Theft Movement, in this first part of our exploration on stock buybacks, will cover:

  • What is a stock buyback?
  • German buyback regulations vs. U.S. regulations
  • The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-18

What is a Stock Buyback? 


A stock buyback (a.k.a a share repurchase) refers to when a corporation buys back its shares from the marketplace. By simultaneously absorbing its own stock and reducing the number of shares on the market, the business increases its relative ownership stake. 

Companies can execute a buyback in two ways: a tender offer or re-purchasing through the open market. 

Tender Offer

The company shareholders get a tender offer, which requests they submit, or tender, some or all of their shares within a designated period. The tender offer informs shareholders of the number of shares the company intends to buy back and an estimated price range for the shares. Shareholders who accept the offer state how many shares they wish to tender and the price they deem acceptable. After receiving responses from its shareholders, the company determines the tender offers that allow it to buy its shares at the lowest cost while honoring the shareholders proposed price. 

Open Market

The company simply buys back its shares on the open market at its listed price. Stock buybacks often cause the shares to shoot up in price because the market views these reinvestments as a sign of a healthy/profitable business. 

Join the movement to eliminate the rigged layer of the economy! Don’t believe you’re getting ripped off by crony capitalists and corrupt officials? Read the Total Theft Report…

German Buyback Regulations

On May 1, 1988, the Law on Control and Transparency (KonTraG) became effective. The legislation allows companies to buy back up to 10% of their shares, only after they follow a standardized procedure.

  1. The buyback must receive approval at the annual general meeting of shareholders (AGM);
  2. Shareholders must decide on the maximum amount of shares the company can repurchase. As a rule, buybacks must be made using distributable profits;
  3. The AGM must a buyback period, which cannot exceed 18 months; 
  4. An exact buyback method must be identified and established unless the repurchase is going to be executed through the free market;
  5. Germany’s financial services authority (BaFin) must receive immediate notification that the AGM has authorized the buyback;
  6. The company must make a public announcement but does not have to disclose the amount. 
  7. If the company elects to go through with the stock buyback, transactions must be conducted in a manner where all the firm’s shareholders receive equal treatment. Furthermore, the buyback cannot be used for the purpose of trading. 
  8. At the next AGM, the company must follow up with an explanation of why it repurchased its shares, as well as how many shares and at what price it conducted the buyback.

U.S. Corporate Buybacks

Economist William Lazonick, in a 2014 article for the Harvard Business Review, writes: 

“The SEC [Securities and Exchange Commission] requires companies to report total quarterly repurchases but not daily ones, meaning that it cannot determine whether a company has breached the 25% limit without a special investigation.”

A year later, Lazonick published further research on stock buybacks. He focuses his attention on open-market repurchases and SEC Rule 10b-18, in particular.


Rule 10b-18 was created to reduce liability for companies (or their affiliate purchases) when they buy back their common stocks. If companies/affiliates abide by the following four conditions when repurchasing shares, the SEC cannot deem their transactions violations of anti-fraud provisions stated in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.   

  1. All shares must be purchased from a single broker or deal during a single day. 
  2. Companies with average daily trading volumes (ADTV) under $1 million/day or that have public float values under $150 million cannot trade during the final 30 minutes of the trading window. Companies with higher average trading volume or public float value can trade until the last 10 minutes. 
  3. The issuer must buy back its shares at a cost that does not exceed the highest independent bid or the most recent quoted price.
  4. The issuer cannot buy back over 25% of the average daily volume.

Lazonick, skeptical of the effectiveness of Rule 10b-18, writes: “Under Rule 10b-18, companies need not disclose the actual amount of buybacks that they do on any given day, either at the time when they are done or after the fact. If the SEC is going to continue to permit open-market repurchases by companies, it should at least require each company to reveal immediately, on a daily basis, how much it has done on any given day so that the agency and the public can assess whether stock-price manipulation is going on. It would then also be transparent if executives and other insiders have timed the sales of their own personal holdings of the companies’ shares (including those acquired from exercising stock options or the vesting of stock awards) to take advantage of price boosts from buyback activity…”

Germany vs. The U.S.

Under KonTraG, Germany appears to place tight restrictions on all share buyback programs. Not only do corporations operating in Germany have a 10% limit, but they also have to adhere to strict reporting requirements. 

Companies operating in the U.S., under Rule 10b-18, do not have the same degree of regulatory restrictions as companies operating in Germany. It’s almost as if there’s essentially no real restrictions, really. 

The highly esteemed New York Times published an opinion piece on stock buybacks, claiming: “In 2003, the SEC revealed that it was aware of the use of buybacks to manipulate the stock market. The agency acknowledged, in amending Rule 10b-18 to include block trades, that ‘during the late 1990s, it was reported that many companies were spending more than half their net income on massive buyback programs that were intended to boost share prices—often supporting their share price at levels far above where they would otherwise trade.’”


Should we adopt and adapt Germany’s share buyback laws? Not necessarily in full or provision for provision, but some parts at least?

The Securities Exchange Act 

Rather than creating regulations limiting share buybacks, the Securities Exchange Act seems to have assisted widespread repurchases. 

The aforementioned Loznick, along with Mustafa Erdem Sakinc and Matt Hopkins, penned an article called ‘Why Stock Buybacks Are Dangerous for the Economy.’ The three economists argue, “Stock buybacks done as open-market repurchases emerged as a major use of corporate funds in the mid-1980s after the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted Rule 10b-18, which gives corporate executives a safe harbor against stock-price manipulation charges that otherwise might have applied.”

According to a 2017 Forbes article, “For most of the 20th century, stock buybacks were deemed illegal because they were thought to be a form of stock market manipulation. But since 1982, when they were essentially legalized by the SEC, buybacks have become perhaps the most popular financial engineering tool in the C-Suite tool shed. And it’s obvious why Wall Street loves them: Buying back company stock can inflate a company’s share price and boost its earnings per share — metrics that often guide lucrative executive bonuses.”


By passing the Securities Exchange Act, and Rule 10b-18 in particular, did Congress contribute to making stock buybacks a powerful tool for the wealthy few who own the majority of the U.S. stock market?

Ready for Part II?

In part II, we investigate whether stock buybacks are depleting funds that should arguably be going to the government and us, the American people.

Eradicate the Rigged Layer with the Zero Theft Movement 

The rigged layer of the economy has enabled crony capitalists and corrupt officials to unethically profit off of us, the American people. This corruption has led to the five decades of wage suppression, five decades of price fixing and anti-competitive markets, and five decades of legislators and regulators who work for moneyed interests, not our interests. 

It’s about time we fought for what’s ours. We cannot do it without you. 

View how much is being stolen, according to the public

Investigate your areas of interest

Crony capitalists and corrupt officials could be rigging numerous areas throughout the economy. We need to systematically investigate and vote on each instance in order to expose exactly where we are being ripped off. 

Find out if the pharmaceutical industry is rigging the cost of Penicillin, and fixing drug prices in general.

Learn about how the oil industry might be controlled by the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC). 

Alternatively, find an area that interests you most.

Serve your fellow citizens as a citizen investigator

The success of our movement rests in your hands, the leaders willing to dedicate time to conduct investigations into potentially rigged areas of the economy. With your valuable work, the movement has no solid ground to stand on, no foundations, no proof, to actually hold those corrupting our system accountable for their actions.

Commitment to nonpartisanship

The rigged layer causes all of us to suffer, regardless of our political allegiances. If we are to eliminate rigged economy theft, we have to set aside our differences and band together against crony capitalists and corrupt officials. 

Free Educational Content

An educated public is an empowered public. 

We regularly publish informative articles on that teach you all about the rigged layer of the economy in short, digestible pieces. You can better protect yourself and others from the schemes of crony capitalists by reading our articles.

Standard Disclaimer

The ZeroTheft Movement does not have any interest in partisan politics/competition or attacking/defending one side. We seek to eradicate theft from the U.S economy. In other words, how the wealthy and powerful rig the system to steal money from us, the everyday citizen. We need to collectively fight against crony capitalism in order for us to all profit from an ethical economy.   

Terms like ‘steal,’ ‘theft,’ and ‘crime’ will frequently appear throughout the article. ZeroTheft will NOT adhere strictly to the legal definitions of these terms (since congress sells out). We have broadly and openly defined terms like ‘steal’ and ‘theft’ to refer to the rigged economy and other debated unethical acts that can cause citizens to lose out on money they deserve to keep.